📌 Struggling with event engagement? This event app fixed it! 

Download now

📌 Struggling with event engagement? This event app fixed it! 

Download now

8 Best Splash Alternatives in 2026 (Now That Cvent Owns It)

Wed, 15 Apr 2026

image-alternative-text
Sara Roy

TL;DR:

Splash users leave because support takes months, the builder fights you on basic customization, bugs cause downtime, and pricing is steep for what you get. Cvent buying Splash in 2024 made most of those worse.

Best alternatives by use case:

  • Full-stack event management (check-in, badges, engagement): Nunify
  • API-first enterprise workflows: Eventtia
  • Hybrid events with built-in streaming: Accelevents
  • Virtual summits: HeySummit
  • India/APAC on a budget: Samaaro
  • Asia-Pacific hybrid conferences: EventX
  • Simple ticketing (but Bending Spoons is acquiring them, so watch pricing): Eventbrite

We scored every alternative against the five pain points Splash users report most on G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius: slow customer support, clunky page builders, limited customization, reliability issues, and opaque pricing.

Why Teams Are Leaving Splash in 2026

The reasons people searched "Splash alternatives" in 2023 and the reasons they search it today are different.

Before the acquisition, the complaints were product-level.

Users reported support response times stretching past two months. The landing page builder had unresponsive content blocks that distorted padding and width on mobile. Customization hit a wall fast: no easy multi-session events, restrictive templates, and layout changes that required workarounds.

Bugs caused site downtime that one TrustRadius reviewer called "mass panic." And pricing felt steep for what you got, with key features locked behind tiers.

Those problems haven't gone away. Cvent buying Splash in September 2024 made most of them worse.

Support? Cvent routes non-enterprise customers through layers of account management. If Splash's email-only support frustrated you, Cvent's tiered system won't feel like an upgrade unless you're paying for a dedicated CSM.

Builder simplicity? Cvent's platform requires formal training and onboarding. It was built for centralized event teams with dedicated admins, not a marketing manager who needs a branded event page in 20 minutes. The thing Splash users liked most (speed to publish) is the first thing that disappears inside Cvent's workflow.

Pricing transparency? Cvent is the industry's poster child for opaque pricing. Custom quotes only, multi-year contracts, overage fees tied to event volume and attendee count. Splash's pricing was frustrating. Cvent's is a black box.

Splash's brand may eventually be retired, according to a Cvent spokesperson. The product is now Cvent's self-serve "field marketing" tier. That means its roadmap serves Cvent's strategy, not yours.

Then there's the broader consolidation wave. Cvent also acquired ON24 and Goldcast in December 2025, spending roughly $700 million in a single month. Splash is becoming a feature inside a much larger, more expensive platform.

That's the context for this list.

How We Scored These Alternatives

Every alternative was evaluated on the five dimensions that Splash users complain about most, based on verified review data from G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius:

Scoring Dimension

What We Checked

Why It Matters

Support Responsiveness

Live chat, phone, average response time, dedicated CSM availability

Splash's #1 complaint: months-long email-only support

Builder and UI Flexibility

Page customization, drag-and-drop quality, responsive design, email builder

Splash's content blocks break on mobile, padding distorts

Multi-Event Complexity

Multi-session, hybrid, virtual, trade show, multi-day support

Splash struggles with anything beyond single-page RSVP events

Reliability

Uptime track record, known bug patterns, data sync consistency

"Consistently Unreliable" is a direct TrustRadius quote on Splash

Pricing Transparency

Published pricing, clear tier structure, no hidden overage fees

Splash does not publish list prices; most buyers negotiate blind

A score of Strong means the platform clearly outperforms Splash on that dimension. Adequate means roughly comparable. Weak means the same problem exists or worse.

Quick Comparison: All 8 Alternatives Scored

Platform

Support

Builder/UI

Multi-Event

Reliability

Pricing Clarity

Best For

Cvent

Strong

Adequate

Strong

Strong

Weak

Enterprise teams running 100+ events/year with venue sourcing needs

Nunify

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Mid-market B2B teams that need registration, check-in, badges, and engagement in one platform

Eventtia

Strong

Adequate

Strong

Adequate

Adequate

API-first teams building custom event workflows with open API access

Accelevents

Adequate

Strong

Strong

Adequate

Strong

Hybrid and virtual event teams that need built-in streaming

HeySummit

Adequate

Strong

Adequate

Adequate

Strong

Virtual summit organizers running speaker-heavy programs

Samaaro

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Strong

India and APAC teams looking for marketing automation with event management

EventX

Adequate

Adequate

Strong

Adequate

Adequate

Asia-Pacific enterprise teams running hybrid conferences

Eventbrite

Weak

Strong

Weak

Adequate

Strong

Simple ticketed consumer events with no B2B complexity

1. Cvent

image-alternative-text

What it is: The enterprise event management platform that now owns Splash. Yes, we're listing the parent company as an alternative. Here's why: if Cvent is going to fold Splash into its stack anyway, some teams are better off migrating now on their own terms rather than waiting for a forced transition later.

Cvent covers the full event lifecycle: venue sourcing, registration, attendee management, mobile app, on-site check-in, web conferencing, and analytics. After going private through Blackstone's $4.6 billion acquisition in 2023, Cvent has been on an acquisition spree: Splash (September 2024), Goldcast and ON24 (December 2025).

Where it beats Splash: Multi-event complexity. This is the one area where the Cvent acquisition genuinely helps.

Cvent handles multi-session conferences, trade shows, hybrid events, and virtual events without workarounds. CRM integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot are deep and bi-directional. Analytics and reporting go far beyond Splash's dashboard. The mobile app is a full attendee experience, not just a check-in tool.

Where it doesn't: Everything we covered in the "Why Teams Are Leaving" section applies here, magnified. Cvent is not simple. It requires training and onboarding. Pricing is opaque and expensive: custom quotes only, multi-year contracts with overage fees.

The honest question: if you're leaving Splash because of slow support, limited customization, and opaque pricing, does switching to the company that bought Splash actually solve those problems? For enterprise teams with budget and dedicated event staff, yes. For everyone else, you're trading one set of frustrations for a more expensive version of the same ones.

Who should switch here: Large enterprise teams with dedicated event staff, six-figure event budgets, and 100+ events per year. If Cvent reaches out offering a migration path from Splash, evaluate it seriously. But go in with your eyes open about what you're signing up for.

Cvent alternatives

2. Nunify

image-alternative-text

What it is: A full-stack event management platform built for B2B teams that run in-person, hybrid, and virtual events across the US, UAE, and India. The product suite covers registration, email marketing, a mobile app, and on-site check-in with QR code scanning and badge printing (SNAP). It also includes attendee engagement and gamification (Qzero), live streaming, analytics, and white-label branding.

Where it beats Splash: The biggest gap Splash leaves is everything that happens after someone RSVPs. Nunify covers that entire workflow: from registration through QR code-based check-in, on-site badge printing, session tracking, engagement scoring, and post-event data.

The numbers tell the story.

Manual check-in runs 45-90 seconds per person with a 15-20% error rate. Nunify's app check-in via QR code scanning runs 5-15 seconds per staff-assisted scan. That pushes throughput from 40-80 people per hour to 240-400.

Self-service kiosks with QR code readers handle 10-30 seconds per person and replace 2-3 staff members each. For events with 500+ attendees, that translates to 60-70% fewer registration staff on-site. Sending a "QR ready" reminder email before the event cuts average check-in time by another 15-20% (Nunify data across 200+ events).

Customization goes deeper than page templates. The platform supports white-label branding across the entire attendee experience: event pages, mobile app, email, badges, and check-in screens. API access and single sign-on (SSO) are available for enterprise workflows. CRM integration with Salesforce, HubSpot, and marketing automation platforms keeps attendee data flowing into your existing sales pipeline.

Pricing is published and transparent. No negotiating in the dark.

Where it doesn't: If you only need a pretty landing page and an RSVP form for a 30-person dinner, Nunify is more platform than you need. The worth-it threshold is around 75 attendees. Under 50, stick with a simpler tool (Nunify data across 200+ events).

Who should switch here: Mid-market B2B marketing and event management teams running 75+ attendee events who need registration, on-site operations, attendee engagement, and analytics in one tool. Especially if you're tired of duct-taping Splash to a separate check-in app, a separate badge printer, and a separate analytics dashboard.

Splash alternative landing page

3. Eventtia

image-alternative-text

What it is: An event management software platform built for large organizations that need deep API access and enterprise-grade data security. Eventtia serves B2B customers including Fortune 500 companies, nonprofits, and universities across North America, Europe, South America, and the Middle East.

Where it beats Splash: Open API is the standout. Eventtia's API documentation and developer ecosystem allow custom workflows that Splash's limited integrations can't match. Role-based access control, SSO, and data security compliance (including GDPR) address enterprise requirements that Splash never prioritized. Customer support includes 24/7 availability with online chat, phone, and a knowledge base, a direct contrast to Splash's email-only support bottleneck.

The platform handles registration, check-in, badge management, email marketing, virtual and hybrid event broadcasting, attendee matchmaking, and analytics. Payment processing integrates with Stripe and PayPal. CRM connections include Salesforce, HubSpot, and Microsoft Dynamics 365.

Where it doesn't: The builder and landing page tools are functional, not beautiful. If Splash's strongest card was design quality, Eventtia trades visual polish for backend power. Pricing requires custom quotes for most tiers.

Who should switch here: Enterprise teams with in-house developers who need API-first event management software with strong data security, open API access, and the ability to build custom event workflows.

4. Accelevents

image-alternative-text

What it is: An event management platform with built-in virtual and hybrid event capabilities, including native live streaming and web conferencing. Accelevents targets mid-market B2B and B2C organizations running conferences, trade shows, and corporate events.

Where it beats Splash: Native streaming and virtual event tools are built into the platform, not bolted on through third-party integrations. The page builder and mobile app are modern and usable.

Accelevents handles registration, ticketing, check-in, badging, gamification, lead capture, and analytics in a single workflow. Marketing integrations include Salesforce, HubSpot, and Marketo. The software also supports trade show exhibitor management with lead scanning and sponsor analytics.

Published pricing makes budgeting straightforward.

Where it doesn't: The brand awareness is lower than Cvent or Eventbrite, which can matter when presenting to budget approvers who want a name they recognize. Virtual event features are strong, but purely in-person event teams may find some of the UX optimized for hybrid workflows.

Who should switch here: Teams running hybrid and virtual events who need streaming, engagement, and analytics without managing separate platforms for in-person and online audiences.

5. HeySummit

image-alternative-text

What it is: A virtual summit and online event platform designed for speaker-heavy programs. HeySummit focuses on multi-session virtual events with automated speaker management, attendee tracking, and email marketing.

Where it beats Splash: If you're running virtual summits, webinar series, or speaker-led programs, HeySummit is purpose-built for that workflow. Speaker management (invitations, bios, session scheduling, automated reminders) is a core feature, not an afterthought.

The builder is drag-and-drop with responsive design. Pricing is published and tiered by feature set, not attendee volume. Web conferencing integrates with Zoom, BlueJeans, and other streaming platforms.

Analytics track attendee engagement per session. Return on investment tracking connects registration data to revenue through landing page conversion metrics and email automation. For B2B teams using virtual events as a lead generation channel, that data pipeline matters.

Where it doesn't: HeySummit is not a full event management platform. No on-site check-in, no badge printing, no physical venue management. If you run in-person events alongside virtual ones, you'll still need a second tool.

Scalability for large enterprise programs is limited compared to Cvent or Nunify. Customer support is primarily email and knowledge base.

Who should switch here: Marketing teams and content creators running recurring virtual summits or webinar series who need speaker management, landing pages, and attendee analytics in one tool.

6. Samaaro

image-alternative-text

What it is: An event marketing and management software platform based in India, focused on marketing automation, lead capture, and return on investment tracking for corporate events.

Where it beats Splash: Marketing automation features go deeper than Splash's basic email builder. Samaaro connects event registration data directly to CRM and marketing automation workflows, tracking cost per lead and attribution through the sales pipeline.

Badge management, check-in, and on-site tools are included. Published pricing without hidden overage fees.

For India and APAC markets, local support and regional data compliance are advantages over US-centric platforms.

Total cost of ownership is lower than most competitors on this list. The platform is built for the budget-conscious B2B team that needs event management, marketing automation, and analytics without paying enterprise prices.

Where it doesn't: Brand recognition outside India and APAC is low. The platform's usability and design polish don't match Splash's page builder quality. Virtual and hybrid event features are functional but not as mature as Accelevents or HeySummit. Customer support is adequate but not differentiated.

Who should switch here: India and APAC-based B2B teams that prioritize marketing automation, lead tracking, and cost efficiency over design polish. Also a strong option for global companies running events in India who need local support.

7. EventX

image-alternative-text

What it is: A hybrid event platform headquartered in Hong Kong, serving enterprise customers across Asia-Pacific, North America, and Europe. EventX focuses on hybrid and virtual conferences with AI-powered attendee matching and business-to-business networking tools.

Where it beats Splash: Multi-event complexity is the strength. EventX handles large hybrid conferences with virtual and in-person attendees in a unified workflow.

Attendee matchmaking uses AI to suggest networking connections based on business profiles. Scalability supports enterprise event programs across multiple regions. Web conferencing and live streaming are integrated.

Analytics cover engagement across both virtual and physical touchpoints.

Where it doesn't: The platform is optimized for the Asia-Pacific market. Teams running US-only or Europe-only event programs may find the UX and support less tailored to their needs. The builder is functional, not exceptional. Pricing requires custom quotes for enterprise tiers.

Who should switch here: Asia-Pacific enterprise teams running large hybrid conferences that need attendee matchmaking, multi-region support, and integrated virtual and in-person analytics.

8. Eventbrite

image-alternative-text

What it is: A ticketing and event registration platform originally built for consumer events. Bending Spoons, an Italian PE firm, is acquiring Eventbrite for approximately $500 million (announced December 2025, expected to close H1 2026).

Where it beats Splash: The builder is genuinely easy to use. Creating an event page, setting up ticketed registration, and publishing takes minutes.

For simple RSVP or ticketed events with basic email marketing, Eventbrite's usability is hard to beat. Brand recognition is high: attendees know and trust the Eventbrite checkout flow. Pricing is published and straightforward.

Where it doesn't: This is the most important caveat on this list.

Bending Spoons has a pattern with acquired companies: cut headcount, raise prices, and restructure the technology. After acquiring Evernote, they cut roughly 75% of WeTransfer's staff. Eventbrite's revenue has been flat at roughly $325 million for two consecutive years. The roadmap focuses on consumer events and secondary ticketing, not B2B event management.

Eventbrite has no native hybrid or virtual event tools, no on-site badge printing, no multi-session management, no CRM integration beyond basic data export, and limited analytics. For B2B marketing teams, it's a ticketing tool, not event management software. Customer support post-acquisition is an open question.

Who should switch here: Teams running simple, small-scale ticketed events (under 200 attendees) with no need for CRM integration, on-site operations, or marketing automation. Be aware that pricing and product quality may change significantly after the Bending Spoons acquisition closes.

When You Should Stay on Splash

Not every team needs to leave. Splash still works if:

You run fewer than 50 single-page RSVP events per year. Your events are simple: one landing page, one confirmation email, one check-in list. You don't need on-site badge printing, multi-session management, or engagement tools.

Your team is already trained on the builder and your templates are set. You're comfortable with Cvent as the parent company and a potential future migration path.

If that sounds like you, switching has a real cost (migration time, retraining, workflow disruption) and the upside is marginal. Stay until something breaks.

If you're hitting any of the five pain points we scored on, especially support responsiveness and multi-event complexity, that "something" has probably already broken.

The Total Cost of Ownership Question Nobody Asks

Most comparison articles list subscription prices and move on. That misses the actual cost of running events on a platform.

Total cost of ownership for event management software goes beyond the subscription fee. You're also paying for integration costs (connecting CRM, marketing automation, payment processing) and on-site hardware (badge printers, kiosks, scanners). Add staff time for manual workarounds, training costs, and revenue lost to registration errors and slow check-in.

For Splash specifically, the hidden cost is all the tools you're paying for alongside it. Splash for pages and email. A separate check-in app. A separate badge solution. A separate analytics tool. That's four subscriptions to do what one platform should cover.

At 75+ attendee events, the operational cost of manual check-in alone (45-90 seconds per person, 15-20% error rate) adds up to hours of wasted staff time (Nunify data across 200+ events).

Add up your full stack cost, not just the subscription line item. And factor in customer support quality: online chat, phone, dedicated CSM, or email-only. When something breaks during a live event, waiting two months for an email response costs you in attendee experience, not just dollars.

FAQ

  • Not yet. Splash is still operational and accepting customers as of April 2026. But a Cvent spokesperson indicated the brand may eventually be retired. Cvent is positioning Splash as its self-serve field marketing tier, which means its roadmap is now part of Cvent's product strategy, not independent.

  • Aventri merged with MeetingPlay in January 2022 and rebranded as Stova in October 2022. The Aventri brand no longer exists as a standalone product. If you see "Aventri" on competitor comparison pages, that information is outdated.

  • No. Eventbrite is a consumer ticketing platform focused on simple events. It lacks CRM integration, on-site badge management, hybrid event tools, marketing automation, and multi-session support.

    The Bending Spoons acquisition (expected to close H1 2026) adds further uncertainty around pricing and product stability. For B2B event management, look at Cvent, Nunify, Eventtia, or Accelevents.

  • Samaaro offers the lowest total cost of ownership for teams in India and APAC. For US-based teams, HeySummit (virtual events only) and Accelevents offer published pricing at accessible tiers. Nunify provides transparent pricing for the full event management stack. Cvent and Eventtia require custom quotes and typically cost more.

  • Most platforms on this list support CSV data import for attendee lists, registration records, and contact data. Splash allows data export. CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot) can serve as a bridge during migration, syncing your historical attendee data into the new platform. Plan for 2-4 weeks of migration time depending on your event history volume and template complexity.